Free
First measure
Check your AI readiness
- 1 user included
- 1 priority page on 1 site
- Track 3 customer questions
- AI readiness score across 6 categories
- Your top 3 issues, ranked by impact
- 1 AI answer check and 3 scans a month
A free check of the AI answers your buyers see
Robot Visible shows how your brand appears in live AI answers, why competitors win, what to fix next, and whether the change worked.
No sign-up. One live answer. One next move.
northloop.example
Illustrative example
Stage 1 of 5 · Measure reality
Each mark is one check against the initial HTML we receive, before any JavaScript runs, including exact-URL robots.txt policy for each named AI crawler.
Readable, indexed, and permitted. None of that is evidence that an assistant recommends you. That is what the next stage measures.
NextThe question you were measured on is the answer the next stage reads.
Stage 2 of 5 · See why others win
One of those answers, in full
RivalTrack is the one most often recommended for mid-size remote teams, and publishes its workflow benchmarks openly.
Answers by question
3 of 8 questions
What are the best workflow analytics tools?
How do I measure workflow bottlenecks?
Best tools to track team process metrics
NextThe competitor and source that won the answer become the gap the next move has to close.
Stage 3 of 5 · Choose the next move
Highest impact
Publish the remote-team workflow analytics use case
The question is about remote teams and the winning source answers it with concrete benchmarks. State Northloop's setup time, workflow metrics, and remote-team use case in the page body.
/remote
What this was drawn from
The cited page names remote-team workflow benchmarks, setup time, and the reporting method in the page body. Northloop's equivalent page describes analytics generally, so the answer had no remote-team evidence to quote back.
The page the answer used instead of yours:
rivaltrack.example/remote-team-benchmarks
Ranked by likely impact, not predicted. Nothing here forecasts what an answer will say next.
NextThe chosen opportunity carries its evidence into the change you ship.
Stage 4 of 5 · Make the change
src/app/remote/page.tsx
- <p>Workflow analytics for modern teams.</p>+ <p>Remote teams can find stage-level wait time, handoff delay, and cycle-time trends in under ten minutes.</p>Before anything is published
Publishing proves the change is live. Whether it moved the answer is the next stage, and only a comparable check can say.
NextThe published change and its date become the baseline the next check is compared against.
Stage 5 of 5 · Prove what moved
The comparable check
Same question, same provider, same API surface, 21 days later. A comparable check, not a guarantee that the change caused it.
Four citations out of thirty-two answers is a real result and a modest one. A grid that turned mostly green after one change would not be evidence. It would be a promise.
Answers by question
3 of 8 questions
What are the best workflow analytics tools?
How do I measure workflow bottlenecks?
Best tools to track team process metrics
Back to the startA flat or declined result is not a failure of the loop. It is the next thing to measure.
Live answer evidence
A real question, asked of a real answer engine, printed verbatim with its timestamp.
Exact source URLs
The pages the answer leaned on, named rather than summarised.
Reviewable GitHub & Shopify changes
Nothing is published until you approve the diff.
Comparable before/after proof
The same question, the same surface, asked again after the change went live.
One B2B SaaS buyer question
Perplexity · Sonar API · 12 June 2026
Illustrative example
AskedWhat are the best workflow analytics tools for remote teams?
For workflow analytics on remote teams, three tools come up most consistently:
RivalTrack (recommended, cited, mentioned) is the one most often recommended for mid-size remote teams, and publishes its workflow benchmarks openly.
PulseMetrics (cited, mentioned) covers stage-level bottlenecks, and lists its reporting method on its own analytics page.
FlowBoard (mentioned) also tracks team process metrics, though its remote-work guidance is lighter.
| Brand | Role in this answer, and the source cited |
|---|---|
| RivalTrack | RecommendedCitedMentionedrivaltrack.example/remote-team-benchmarks |
| PulseMetrics | CitedMentionedpulsemetrics.example/workflow-analytics-method |
| FlowBoard | MentionedNo source cited |
| Northloop | Not in this answerNot recommended. Not cited. Not mentioned. |
This is the result the rest of this page is about changing.
Fictional companies, on the reserved .example domain. The evidence shapes are the product's own.
Not a ranking we invented. This is who the answers actually named across your buyer questions, how often, and which of their pages did it.
northloop.example
Illustrative example
Share of AI voice
Across 8 answered buyer questions on 12 Jun 2026. RivalTrack appears most often among competitors. You appeared in 2 of 8, and were actively recommended in 1.
13%
of brand appearances are you
NorthloopYou
2 of 81 recommended
RivalTrack
rivaltrack.example
6 of 84 without you4 recommended5 cited
PulseMetrics
pulsemetrics.example
4 of 83 without you1 recommended3 cited
FlowBoard
flowboard.example
3 of 83 without you
Competitors won 6 answers where you didn't appear. Most of those name more than one competitor, so the rows above come to 10 placements across 6 answers.
The answer behind one of those rows
What are the best workflow analytics tools for remote teams?
Companies this answer recommended, mentioned, or cited alongside you, or instead of you.
RivalTrack
rivaltrack.exampleRivalTrack is the one most often recommended for mid-size remote teams, and publishes its workflow benchmarks openly.rivaltrack.example/remote-team-benchmarks
PulseMetrics
pulsemetrics.examplePulseMetrics covers stage-level bottlenecks, and lists its reporting method on its own analytics page.pulsemetrics.example/workflow-analytics-method
FlowBoard
FlowBoard also tracks team process metrics, though its remote-work guidance is lighter.
Suggested automatically from this one Perplexity answer and the pages it cited. It may be incomplete or wrong, so you decide who actually competes for this question.
A free scan shows the snapshot on the right. Monitor keeps the ranked picture above it: the competitors, your questions, four answer engines, and what moves between checks.
Fictional companies, on the reserved .example domain. The evidence shapes are the product's own.
No aggregate uplift claim. One question, with the dates that make the comparison mean something.
Perplexity · Sonar API · one question, 21 days apart
Illustrative exampleProven win
PR #214 · Measured after publication on 19 Jun 2026.
Fictional companies, on the reserved .example domain. The evidence shapes are the product's own. See every step of this chain.
MeasureUnderstand
Scan your pages for AI readiness, then read the live answers, the sources behind them, and the brands appearing beside you.
Decide
Compare your results against the competitors who won, then take one ranked opportunity at a time with the evidence behind it.
ShipProve
Approve the change, publish the fix through GitHub or Shopify, verify it went live, and measure AI visibility afterwards.
Who this is for
Start without a consultant. Get the next action in plain language. Keep every change reviewable. Add monitoring when the questions matter enough to track.
Annual billing gives you 2 months free.
Free
First measure
Check your AI readiness
Monitor
Repeat measure
Track your visibility every week
Then $39/month · Card required · Cancel within 30 days and you are not charged.
Fix & Prove
Close the loop
Ship evidence-backed fixes and prove the result
Then $129/month · Card required · Cancel within 30 days and you are not charged.
What to know before your first scan.
No sign-up. One live answer. One next move.